The author of the article has experienced the "quadfecta" of AI-generated content, or "slop", in academia, encountering it in four situations: student submissions, peer review reports, paper submissions, and referee reports. The issue with AI slop is not just its potential inaccuracy, but also its overwhelming quantity, verbosity, and tendency to nitpick minor issues, making it difficult for reviewers to evaluate what's important. This has led to a "slop overload" that is consuming bandwidth and hindering the ability to assess academic work, with the author and others, such as a BIP Editor, experiencing similar issues with AI-generated submissions, replies, reviews, and requests to fix minor issues.